Showing posts with label commercial real estate. Show all posts
Showing posts with label commercial real estate. Show all posts

Dec 9, 2008

The CRE Bust: Quick Overview

This post is a summary of recent commercial real estate (CRE) data suggesting that investment in non-residential real estate will decline sharply over the next several quarters.

Note: There is another problem with CRE too (not discussed here) - many existing properties were recently purchased at prices that were based on overly optimistic pro forma income projections. These loans typically included reserves to pay interest until rents increased (like a negatively amortizing option ARM), and it is likely that many of these deals will blow up when the interest reserve is depleted - probably in the 2009-2010 period.

Historically investment in non-residential structures lags investment in residential by 5 to 8 quarters. The reasons are pretty clear - the commercial builders (for malls, offices, lodging, etc.) usually build after they "see the rooftops", i.e. the residential is in place.

It appears the Commercial Real Estate (CRE) bust has started. Here is a summary of recent data:

  • From the American Institute of Architects:

    AIA Architecture Billing Index Click on graph for larger image in new window.
    On the heels of a six-point drop in September, the Architecture Billings Index (ABI) plummeted to its lowest level since the survey began in 1995. As a leading economic indicator of construction activity, the ABI shows an approximate nine to twelve month lag time between architecture billings and construction spending. The American Institute of Architects (AIA) reported the October ABI rating was 36.2, down significantly from the 41.4 mark in September (any score above 50 indicates an increase in billings). The inquiries for new projects score was 39.9, also a historic low point.
    emphasis added
    The key here is that the index fell off a cliff in early 2008, and that there is "an approximate nine to twelve month lag time between architecture billings and construction spending". We should expect weaker non-residential structure investment for the foreseeable future (at least through 2009).

  • From the Fed: The October 2008 Senior Loan Officer Opinion Survey on Bank Lending Practices

    CRE Loan Demand vs. Non-residential Investment Structures Of particular interest is the increase in tighter lending standards for Commercial Real Estate (CRE) loans. This graph compares investment in non-residential structure with the Fed's loan survey results for lending standards (inverted) and CRE loan demand.

    Note that any reading below zero for loan demand means less demand than the previous quarter. This is strong evidence of a significant slump in CRE investment.

  • Construction Spending. From the Census Bureau: September 2008 Construction at $1,060.1 Billion Annual Rate

    Construction SpendingThe graph shows private residential and nonresidential construction spending since 1993.
    Nonresidential construction was at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of $417.7 billion in October, 0.7 percent below the revised September estimate of $420.6 billion.
    It appears spending on private non-residential construction (blue line) peaked in June and is just starting to decline.

  • Commercial Bank Delinquency Rates This graph based on data from the Federal Reserve shows the delinquency rates at the commercial banks for residential and commercial real estate.

    Commercial real estate delinquencies are rising rapidly, and are at the highest rate since Q3 '94 (as delinquency rates declined following the S&L crisis).

  • Mall vacancy rates rising rapidly.

    U.S. Real House Prices vs. Real Consumer SpendingFrom the WSJ: Mall Vacancies Grow as Retailers Pack Up Shop
    For strip centers and other open-air shopping venues, the vacancy rate climbed to 8.4% in the third quarter from 8.1% in the second quarter. That marks the highest rate since 1994, according to Reis.
    This graph shows the strip mall vacancy rate since Q2 2007. Note that the graph doesn't start at zero to better show the change.

  • Office vacancy rates rising.

    From Reuters: Office vacancy rate reaches 2-year high: report
    U.S. office vacancy rose to 13.6 percent, up 0.5 percentage points from the second quarter, its largest one-quarter jump since the second quarter of 2002. The third-quarter vacancy rate was the highest since the second quarter of 2006 and was 110 percentage points higher than its recent low of 12.5 percent set in the third quarter of 2007.

    About 23.7 million square feet of office space was available in the third quarter than was leased. About 18.2 million square feet of that was added in just the third quarter, Reis said. That is more than five times the 3.59 million square feet added in the second quarter.
  • Hotel occupancy rates falling. See PricewaterhouseCoopers: PricewaterhouseCoopers Forecasts a Substantial Reduction in Hotel RevPAR in 2009

    Hotel Occupancy Rate

    This graph shows the annual occupancy rate for the last 50 years. The data is from PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (1958 to 1986), and Smith Travel Research (1987 to 2007).

    The PricewaterhouseCoopers forecast for 2008 and 2009 are in red. Note: The y-axis starts at 50% to better show the change.


  • source: calculatedrisk

    link to the original post:
    http://calculatedrisk.blogspot.com/


    Fort Lauderdale Blog and Real Estate News
    Rory Vanucchi
    RoryVanucchi@gmail.com

    http://waterfrontlife.blogspot.com
    www.FortLauderdaleLiving.net

    Dec 6, 2008

    A Window on Hotel CMBS: Columbia Sussex

    In the four years prior to 2008, mortgage backed securities drove the hotel acquisition market. Though issuance of new CMBS in 2008 has been replaced by withered vines (less than 1/10th the issues in the first two quarters of 2008 compared to 2007, and 0 in the third), CMBS defaults have remained quite low. In the next couple years, however, we’ll be seeing just how those vintages from 5 years back have matured. Will they be Chateau Latour, or will an economy in recession turn them to vinegar?

    While the bulk of CMBSs may be able to survive the recent credit collapse, those with underlying assets that are economically sensitive may have a more difficult time of it, as may be the case with hotels. Projections for 2009 revenue per available rooms (RevPAR, a key metric for hotels) are falling as the economy worsens. Smith Travel Research reports that RevPAR for October 2008 declined 7% from the same month a year ago. If we have a hotel market which stumbles through 2009, two important questions come to the fore. First, could lagging revenues cause trouble in satisfying debt obligations? And second, how will owners refinance when their existing CMBS loans come to term?

    While many CMBSs are based on a mix of commercial property types, those that are heavily skewed towards hotels will warrant a watchful eye. One particular CMBS, the Bear Stearns 2006-BBA7, is composed exclusively of hotel properties, and dominated by hotels owned by Columbia Sussex – one of the largest owners of full-service hotels in the US. Columbia Sussex is owned by William Yung, whose gaming company, Tropicana Entertainment, filed for Chapter 11 protection earlier this year.

    Columbia Sussex loans accounted for 79% of the 2006-BBA7’s original loan principal. $1.1 billion was borrowed to finance acquisition of a portfolio of 14 hotels from Wyndham in October 2005: $570 million in Senior Notes and $532 in Mezzanine Loans. The loan is renewable for a one-year extension in October 2009 before maturing in 2010.

    The real risk for this CMBS is Columbia Sussex’s performance. This portfolio of hotels has seen RevPAR go from $99.60 at issuance (the 12 months ending March 31, 2006) to $105.58 for year-to-date September 2008; occupancy went from 76% at time of issuance to 65% for year-to-date September 2008; and net cash flow declined 6% for YE2007 compared to issuance. These numbers show signs of struggle at a time when the hotel industry generally prospered nationwide.

    Additionally, the portfolio’s second largest hotel, the 707-room Baltimore Sheraton, is in the midst of a labor dispute and boycott which has moved $2.142 million worth of hotel customers since November 2007. To make matters worse, a 757-room Hilton has opened in August 2008, adjacent to the convention center just a few blocks away.

    Heading into a tighter hotel cycle with decreased occupancy and cash flow, this CMBS is one to watch amongst the slew of CMBSs that will require refinancing on the heels of the credit crisis and recession. The simultaneous need to refinance this portfolio’s mezzanine loans may compound efforts to refinance the first mortgage notes backing this CMBS.

    According to Bloomberg News, there will be $185 billion worth of CMBSs coming due between 2010 and 2012 which originated in 2005-2007. “’Barring an economic/credit market miracle between now and then, the combination of falling property values, higher interest rates and tougher underwriting standards means numerous CMBS borrowers will have to come up with more money to refinance or default and return the property back to the lender…” according to a study cited by Bloomberg [10/3/08].

    A full report on the risks associated with the Bear Stearns 2006-BBA7 CMBS, written by the UNITEHERE Research Department, is available at: Columbia Sussex Hotels: The Other Shoe?

    Disclosure: The author is an employee of UNITE HERE, which represents approximately 100,000 non-gaming hotel workers in North America and represents workers at five non-gaming hotels owned and operated by Columbia Sussex, including two with active labor disputes.

    source: seekingalpha.com

    link to the original post:
    http://seekingalpha.com/article/109364-a-window-on-hotel-cmbs-columbia-sussex


    Fort Lauderdale Blog and Real Estate News
    Rory Vanucchi
    RoryVanucchi@gmail.com

    http://waterfrontlife.blogspot.com
    www.FortLauderdaleLiving.net

    Nov 26, 2008

    London’s West End and Moscow remain world’s two most expensive office markets; Dublin rents at 14th rank are almost double Brussels'

    London’s West End and Moscow remain world’s two most expensive office markets; Dublin rents at 14th rank are almost double Brussels'

    By Finfacts Team
    Nov 26, 2008 - 4:34:34 AM


    Top 50 Most Expensive Office Markets as of November 2008 (converted to US dollars)

    London’s West End and Moscow remain the world’s two most expensive office markets, respectively, while Hong Kong’s CBD (Central Business district), Tokyo’s Inner Central District and Mumbai’s Nariman Point round out the top five, according to CB Richard Ellis Group (CBRE) Research’s semi-annual Global MarketView/Office Occupancy Costs survey. Dublin has 14th rank and is fifth highest in Europe. Dublin rents are almost double the level in Brussels, the capital of the European Union.

    The report tracks world markets with the highest as well as fastest-growing occupancy costs for the 12 months ended September 30, 2008.

    The average rate of growth for office occupancy costs among the 172 markets monitored in the survey was 8%, almost double last year’s world inflation rate. Up 94.6%, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates (UAE) had by far the fastest growing occupancy costs, with three of the top five fastest growing countries situated in the Middle East. The rise in occupancy costs in the UAE over the past twelve months has reflected market fundamentals—limited supply of quality office space and high demand from international firms, primarily law firms, financial institutions and real estate and construction companies planting a footprint in the UAE.

    "Our current perceptions are greatly affected by the current economic malaise and we tend to forget how fast rents and occupancy costs were rising over the last 12 months," said Dr. Raymond Torto, CBRE’s Global Chief Economist. "Clearly the rate of change is generally slowing, and in some markets the pricing direction is down. The turn in rent trajectory will provide some relief to occupiers and angst to owners. However, unlike previous downturns, which have occurred simultaneously with extensive overbuilding, the real estate market globally today is in a stronger position to weather the difficulties than in the past."

    Asia Pacific was the fastest growing region among markets in the top 50, at an average rate of 26.2%. Among the region’s ten entries into the top 50 fastest growing and second overall, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, was up 51.4%. Multi-national corporation tenants have driven demand for the limited supply of prestige prime office buildings in that city; however Ho Chi Minh City’s rents largely surged in the fourth quarter of 2007 and the first half of 2008. Perth, Australia, was second in the region and fourth overall, up 45.2%, while Hong Kong’s CBD had the third largest increase in the region and 12th overall, up 29.1%.

    Occupancy costs in the six Latin American markets that made the top 50 fastest growing rankings grew an average of 21.5%, with two new cities—Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic, and Lima, Peru—making the list. São Paulo, Brazil, led the region and was the seventh fastest growing market overall, up 34%. São Paulo’s occupancy cost increase reflects a shortage of prime office space combined with a relatively strong local economy supported by global demand for commodities and a growing middle class. Meanwhile, of the nine North American markets in the top 50 fastest growing rankings (down from the last report’s15 markets), occupancy cost growth rates averaged 14.5%, the slowest of all the regions covered.

    Asia-Pacific

    Hong Kong jumped into the top three most expensive cities globally, with occupancy costs rising to $231.59. Ho Chi Minh City dropped from the top spot to number two among the top 50 fastest growing cities, while Perth, Australia, jumped up 10 spots in the most expensive rankings, coming in at number 31.

    Europe

    London’s West End remained the world’s most expensive office market at $248.66, and Moscow retained its number two spot at $234.73. The City of London was next among the European markets and eighth most expensive overall, at $146.61. In Europe, occupancy costs grew fastest in Moscow and Rome, with increases of 29.8% and 29.5%, respectively.

    Americas

    Five North American cities are among the world’s Top 50 most expensive office markets: Midtown Manhattan (15th at $98.08); Calgary CBD (38th at $66.58); suburban Los Angeles (41st at $63.58); Toronto CBD (43rd at $61.54); and Downtown New York City (48th at $59.16). In Latin America, São Paulo increased nine spots to 26th, at $75.13.

    source: irish finance news

    link to the original post:
    http://www.finfacts.ie/irishfinancenews/article_1015360.shtml



    Fort Lauderdale Blog and Real Estate News
    Rory Vanucchi
    RoryVanucchi@gmail.com

    http://waterfrontlife.blogspot.com
    www.FortLauderdaleLiving.net

    Nov 25, 2008

    South Florida can't count on international investors to bolster property values any more

    There was a time when foreign real estate investors migrated to South Florida like tourists to a theme-park gift shop.

    They had plenty of money, were eager to spend, and there was an abundance of goodies on the shelf. Retail centers, office towers and warehouses were all on their shopping lists, and it seemed none was too pricey or too dowdy to buy.

    While other areas of the country endured economic cycles that often brought periodic chaos to real estate markets elsewhere, South Florida could always count on international investors to propel sales and bolster commercial property values here.

    No more.

    With rare exceptions, offshore buyers are staying home to grapple with an economic meltdown and a credit crisis that began in the U.S. and has spread around the globe.

    “A lot of the investors from areas such as Germany, Britain, Russia and South America had been showing much interest [in South Florida real estate] in the last two or three years,” said Rick Kuci, executive vice president and chief lending officer at Coconut Grove Bank. “But many of those investors are now on the sidelines, having lost money in their own countries. The international [investors] I speak to still think we are six to 12 months away from the bottom.”

    Notable commercial real estate transactions in 2008 involving international investors

    That’s not good news for landlords, brokers and bankers who’ve seen dealmaking stall as credit dries up, economic contraction grips the home nations of buyers, and currency swings take their toll.

    The credit contagion that began in the U.S. this fall has infected almost every developed nation. More than $32 trillion has been lost from the value of global equities this year as the crisis sends economic powers like Germany, the U.K. and Japan into recession.

    Like their U.S. counterparts, European banks and automakers are asking for financial bailouts. A decline in consumer spending in the U.S. and Europe resulted in Asian exports dropping for the first time in six years.

    Like domestic investors, offshore buyers of the area’s commercial real estate — with a few notable exceptions — are especially hamstrung by a lack of financing, according to local players, who say the long-term outlook for the region depends on when investors return and how quickly activity picks up.

    Acquisitions made with at least a portion of international funding have bolstered South Florida commercial real estate for years, especially Miami’s office sector. In the Brickell area alone, six major office buildings have been purchased with capital from foreign firms since 1998, Cushman & Wakefield senior managing director Tere Blanca said during a recent panel discussion about international investment in South Florida.

    In what many in the business hope could signal rising interest from Asian buyers, downtown Miami’s office market got a boost last month when the New York-based subsidiary of Japanese investment firm Sumitomo Corp. bought the 34-story Miami Center office tower for $260 million, or $332.39 per square foot, from Crescent Real Estate Equities.

    Sumitomo general manager Robert Obringer cited the trophy tower’s 96 percent occupancy level and the building’s long-term potential to go up in value.

    The prospects for long-term income growth guided a German investment group’s decision to pay $31.1 million for a 59,155-square-foot retail condominium in Coral Gables’ Plaza San Remo. LIC Coral Gables Retail, whose principals are Heiner Franssen and Gunther Schleip of Berlin, paid $525 per square foot for the retail condo, which is leased to Whole Foods Market.

    Like the few foreign investors still making purchases in the down market, the German group paid cash for the property.

    Although local industry insiders point to the Miami Center deal as a sign that foreigners are still shopping here, grim economic news from the Europe, Asia and elsewhere indicates investors have enough worries at home to keep them away from South Florida.

    A European Union official recently said “extraordinary measures” are needed to keep the Adam Opel unit of General Motors running. Mortgage lending in Britain declined 44 percent last month, compared with 2007. Major British retailers like Marks & Spencer and Woolworths continue to struggle. And German chemical giant BASF announced it is temporarily shutting down 80 plants worldwide and cutting production at another 100.

    “European investment was helping fuel the real estate market here for two years after the domestic market already began to tank,” said Neisen Kasdin, a shareholder at law firm Akerman Senterfitt who specializes in real estate and land-use issues. “The big question that is always out there is will the Far East get involved?”

    That’s unlikely since Asia’s troubles are quickly rivaling those of Europe.

    Japan especially has been hard-hit. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial, the country’s biggest bank, just announced a 64 percent drop in first-half earnings. And the country’s exports fell 7.7 percent in October from a year earlier, the biggest drop since December 2001. Commercial land prices in Tokyo fell 6.2 percent from the previous year, according to the Japan Real Estate Institute. That was the first decline since 2004.

    Japan has invested little in South Florida commercial properties since an earlier economic crisis of the early 1990s, Murphy said.

    “The Japanese have never come back” since the 1990s, he said. “I know [Sumitomo] bought the Miami Center, but that was just taking advantage of a steal. They may come back as a result of that, but they have been inactive for so many years.”

    Yet, some investors elsewhere in Asia are making purchases, according to attorney Tim Murphy, a partner in the Miami office of Shutts & Bowen. Murphy chairs the firm’s international/tax practice group.

    “I cannot reveal any names of clients, but we have had some large-scale Class A investments out of China with no U.S. backers,” he said. “The difficulty in tracking those deals is it is really hard to separate companies from the owners. There are Chinese individuals who control large corporations that in the U.S. would be 99-to-1 [percent] publicly held. These investments are usually driven from the very wealthy Chinese.”

    Although Chinese lenders have generally sidestepped the upheaval of Western nations, China, too, is experiencing a downturn. Economic growth fell to 9 percent in the third quarter, and growth in foreign sales fell in October. In Hong Kong, the territory’s economic growth shrank by 0.5 percent in the third quarter. The country announced a multibillion-dollar plan to stimulate its economy by targeting construction, tax cuts and social programs.

    Still, South Florida commercial real estate brokers are reaching out to the Chinese players to initiate deals. CCIM Miami, a networking and educational group for real estate professionals, hosted a group of Chinese real estate and business investors last month.

    Shift of power

    While real estate experts predict that foreign investors who are waiting out the downturn will eventually come back, the balance of power could shift away from European investors who are dealing with their own credit crisis and a weakening euro. Europe is in a recession for the first time since the currency was launched almost 10 years ago.

    Carolina Rendeiro, founder of Business Centers International, a Miami-based company that assists multinational firms in relocating to the region, said that during a visit to Italy, potential investors acknowledged the country is in the same economic downturn as the U.S.

    “Italians are now using the big ‘R’ word, [admitting] they are in a recession,” Rendeiro said. “Our economic woes are their woes. Investments are starting to falter a bit. As the euro continues to come down,” U.S. real estate will become less attractive.

    Investors from Spain — historically among the most active commercial players in South Florida — are feeling the pinch, too. Few are buying, and other deals they’re involved in are in trouble.

    In July, developer Kenneth Baboun’s plans to build a major mixed-use project in Miami with a Spanish group led by Pedro Iglesias fell apart. Baboun sued Iglesias, claiming the investor owes him more than $25 million on a mortgage loan the developer provided toward the $35 million purchase of the 1-acre property at 1390 Brickell Bay Drive almost two years ago. The suit is pending.

    Spanish buyers have been responsible for several of the year’s largest commercial deals in South Florida, though none since the credit market began to dive in September.

    The real estate arm of Banco Santander last May paid $114 million for the 1401 Brickell office tower the bank currently anchors. The $606 per-square-foot price for the 14-story building was a regional record for office buildings.

    The $34 million sale of the Standard Miami Beach spa-hotel at 40 Island Ave. in April was an example of a Spanish investor’s willingness to pay a premium to enter the South Florida market. Buyer Ferrado Group, based in A Cortuna, Spain, spent about $610 per square foot for the hotel, which sits on 2.33 acres. Ferrado Group officials cited the firm’s desire to expand in the U.S. and noted South Florida’s easy access to Latin America and the Caribbean and its long-standing commercial and political ties to the region.

    Spanish investors remain interested in South Florida properties, according to Israel Alfonso, a shareholder in the corporate securities and real estate practice areas of Greenberg Traurig’s Miami office who primarily represents investors from Spain in real estate transactions.

    “The global slowdown has affected international desire, but deals are still going on,” he said. “In Spain the answer is, yes, they are taking a step back, but the activity has not stopped. It is certainly harder to get deals done.”

    Alfonso did not disclose any deals that recently closed or are in the works.

    Players with sufficient money and a strong currency that could start picking up South Florida properties are in the oil-rich United Arab Emirates, Rendeiro said.

    With that region’s wealth mainly accumulated from oil reserves, investors from Dubai and Abu Dhabi are looking to diversify, Rendeiro said.

    Yet, no significant deals involving Gulf investors have taken place recently and even that region has problems. The price of petroleum has plummeted. Dubai’s debt has soared to $70 billion, more than 100 percent of its gross domestic product. Amlak Financial, the United Arab Emirates’ leading mortgage lender, temporarily stopped making new home loans. And Dubai’s state-owned companies face default on debt payments as the banking crisis curbs their access to cash.

    Countering that was last week’s news that the Dubai Group plans to acquire discounted stakes in U.S. real estate. The Dubai Group is an investment company that manages more than $40 billion on behalf of Dubai’s ruler.

    ‘A beacon of stability’

    Even South Florida’s status as a safe haven for Latin American investors is in jeopardy. No large commercial acquisitions have come from the region since the spread of the credit crunch.

    Click play to listen to Francisco Cerezo

    Investors there are generally avoiding purchases until credit eases and the economic climate improves, said Francisco Cerezo, a shareholder at Greenberg Traurig.

    Latin Americans have reason to be nervous. The area has been battered by a 40 percent drop in regional major stock indexes. Brazil, the continent’s largest economy, has seen its biofuel boom deflate as foreign investment has disappeared. About 10,000 jobs were lost in Sao Paulo state in October.

    Despite the lack of deals, Latin Americans have not given up on South Florida, Cerezo claimed.

    “Stepping back does not mean stepping out altogether,” he said. “I don’t think people are altogether abandoning deals. Perhaps they are looking at deals more carefully.”

    As a result of political and economic turbulence in countries such as Venezuela and Argentina, and a lack of legal protection for real estate contracts in the region, Latin Americans view the U.S. as a “beacon of stability,” Cerezo said. The obvious geographic importance of South Florida to Latin America will also ensure real estate deals will not dry up.

    “The cliche that Miami is the U.S. capital of Latin America still holds true,” Cerezo said. “When there is instability in Latin America, Miami is the place where people want to do business. Latin American investors are also feeling the pinch. When they are looking to find a sign of stability, they won’t find it in their own market.”

    Long-term strategy

    Local players warn that foreign investors looking for commercial real estate acquisitions in South Florida must avoid getting caught up in the desire to generate rapid returns.

    A long-term approach could lead some foreign investors to a commercial sector they avoided in past cycles — land, Kasdin said.

    Hong Kong-based Swire Properties, which built the Brickell Key mixed-use project, paid lender iStar Financial $41.3 million last month for 5.5 vacant acres on South Miami Avenue between Southwest Seventh and Eighth streets. Swire paid for the land in cash.

    Click play to listen to Neisen Kasdin

    “I am not yet seeing foreign money make any plays for distressed assets in Florida yet,” Kasdin said. “If I had to speculate, foreign investors may come into the market to land bank in all-cash deals.”

    A long-term investment outlook is not unusual outside of the U.S., said attorney James Shindell, a partner in Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod and chair of the firm’s real estate group.

    “Other parts of the world are more patient with their money and take a longer view,” Shindell said.

    “For 10 years, you could invest in real estate here, and the values would always go up. Those days are over.”

    Eric Kalis can be reached at (305) 347-6651.

    source: dailybusinessreview.com

    link to the original post:
    South Florida can't count on international investors to bolster property values any more



    Fort Lauderdale Blog and Real Estate News
    Rory Vanucchi
    RoryVanucchi@gmail.com

    http://waterfrontlife.blogspot.com
    www.FortLauderdaleLiving.net