Showing posts with label mortgage. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mortgage. Show all posts

Jan 18, 2009

Commercial Hard Money Loans

Hard are a specific type of asset-based . In this type of loan, a borrower receives funds that are secured by the value of a parcel of . These are paid back with a higher interest than conventional commercial or . This type of loan is rarely, if ever, issued by a commercial or other deposit institution.

Hard are very similar to bridge . Bridge typically have similar criteria for lending. They also have similar costs to the borrower. The primary difference between a hard and a is that a frequently refers to a commercial property or property that is in . The property may not fully qualify for traditional financing yet. Hard commercial refer not only to asset-based with a but also for a situation that is possible distressed. Examples of this include cases where someone is on an existing or where and are already in process.

Hard mortgages, both commercial and residential, are made by private . They typically make only in their local areas. The of the borrower is not important because the loan is secured by the value of the property. The to is 65-70%. This means that if a piece of property is worth $100,000, the lender would give the borrower $65,000 to $70,000. This low (loan-to-value) ratio gives the lender added security in the event that the borrower cannot pay and the lender has to foreclose on the property.

Commercial hard are similar to traditional hard in of the requirements and . A commercial hard lender is typically a strong institution with the deposits and abilities to make discretionary on that are non-conforming. These do not conform to the standards of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, or other residential conforming credit guidelines. Since it’s a commercial property in question, the loan does not generally conform to a standard guideline either.

Traditional commercial hard are very high and have a higher than average default . Just like in a normal , when a defaults on a commercial hard loan, he or she can potentially lose the property to .

For more information on hard lending, please visit http://www.pitbullmortgageschool.com.

Joseph Devine

source:

http://offshoreblog.net/commercial-hard-money-loans/

The End of Large-Bank Wholesale Lending - Time For the Mortgage Banker


Posted on January 16th, 2009 in Daily Mortgage/Housing News - The Real Story, Mr Mortgage's Personal Opinions/Research

The End of Large Bank Wholesale Lending - A Resurgence of Middle Market Mortgage Banking – Chase…a Leading Indicator

This week Chase shut down wholesale mortgage lending but kept retail and correspondent alive. I believe this hasty move is a result of the terrible performance (low pull-though rates and low margin) despite loan application volume soaring. This may be the first visible sign of how tough the mortgage industry really is right now and how little of this recent surge in loan applications are actually resulting in profitably funded loans. As a matter of fact, significant losses can occur when a mortgage bank can’t effectively manage its pipeline of locked and in-process loans. Of note, Credit Suisse recently shut down their wholesale division (Lime) in December out of the blue. This was a newer operation formed in 2008 only doing Fannie, Freddie and FHA loans with no baggage.

This story just out by National Mortgage News points to the gist of this story - just because rates fall and ‘applications’ are up does not mean loans are ‘funding’ banks are making money. Moves like this are to get better clarity about what in the pipeline is real and what may actually fund. This way they can manage and hedge their pipelines better and potentially pass better rates onto the borrower. I can’t post the entire story because NMN is subscription - sorry:

“As the refinancing boom gathers steam selected residential funders are beginning to charge “rate lock” fees to both consumers and loan brokers, according to industry participants.”

Wholesale is priced better than retail because it is supposed to be easier on the lender, leveraging and army of mortgage brokers to aggregate the necessary paperwork and qualify the borrowers prior to the wholesale lender ever seeing it. Because this makes the loan process for the wholesale lender much quicker and efficient, they offer a below market rates to the broker in order for the broker to add in their fees and still be able offer a market rate to the borrower. But wholesale has turned into a very expensive origination channel since rates turned down in late Nov.

The mortgage application/rate lock fall-out, especially on the wholesale side, is extreme due to a) brokers locking and submitting with multiple lenders trying to get the best rate and the largest commissions b) appraisals coming in too low killing the deal c) borrowers not qualifying for today’s sensible underwriting standards d) turn-times being so long borrowers switch lenders for better rates/quicker funding creating even longer turn-times e) rates not really being what borrowers hear quoted in the news or up-front by the loan officer f) lack of reasonably priced Jumbo money. Many of these ‘challenges’ also effect the retail channel as well.

If fall-out and profitability in wholesale were not a problem, then why not ramp up that division? It is not like they are lending their own money – all loans now are Fannie, Freddie and FHA and sold/securitized post-haste. The primary cost of doing wholesale loans comes from the employees and overhead and risk from hedging and buybacks – much of the same as with retail.

We know that based upon primary vs secondary market prices, many banks are not passing through to the home owner all that they could. Instead they are choosing to make a great deal of money on each loan – hey more power to them. But when up to 75% of all wholesale loan applications fall out after submission by the broker, there is a major problem seriously affecting the lender’s ability to perform profitably across their entire mortgage platform.

Of course not all lenders are running at a 75% fall out but three that I track closely have relayed to me that they expect wholesale pull-through rates in the bubble states to be about 25%-30% in January. Back during the boom when literally ‘everyone’ could qualify pull-through rates were at 75-80%. Now even the best lenders are not running at greater than 50%. This is one of the greatest challenges affecting the mortgage space in general with the worst performance coming from the mortgage broker/wholesale side.

Chase’s decision to exit wholesale was simply a choice to do fewer loans more profitably by focusing on retail and correspondent. On the retail side, banks have better control of their own employee loan officers because they can fire them if they do a bad job with respect to quality and pull through. In addition, most bank loan officers do not broker their loans out so the bank has a better idea of what will actually fund. This is unlike wholesale where the bank is always guessing as to what is real but still have to hedge the deals. On the correspondent side, banks also have better control than with wholesale because their middle market mortgage banker clients must deliver what they commit to and the bank has recourse to make the mortgage banker buy back the bad loans.

I believe that you will see other large banks follow Chase’s lead out of wholesale over the near-term. This will prove bad for the mortgage and housing industry as a whole, as there will be less competition in the mortgage finance arena. When fewer players control the market, rates will suffer as profitability is focused upon.

However, as large banks exit wholesale and focus on retail and correspondent it will provide a playing field in which local and regional middle market mortgage bankers can flourish. That is of course, if they can get the warehouse capacity. Fewer banks and more local and regional middle market mortgage bankers slugging it out on their home turf is great for mortgage and housing. -Best Mr Mortgage

source:

http://mrmortgage.ml-implode.com/2009/01/16/the-end-of-large-bank-wholesale-lending-time-for-the-mortgage-banker/



Dec 26, 2008

Refinance rates low; few qualify

Interest rates may have reached their lowest level in nearly 40 years, but that doesn't necessarily spell relief for South Florida's struggling homeowners.

mhatcher@MiamiHerald.com

Recent drops in interest rates have homeowners rushing to call local banks and mortgage lenders about refinancing. Loan applications are pouring in.

Yet, South Florida homeowners are mostly getting a big fat ''No!'' from the bank when they ask to refinance. The chief reason: Falling home values mean they owe more than their homes are worth.

''We got 53 calls to my branch on Friday,'' said Todd LaPenta, a private mortgage banker at Wells Fargo on Lincoln Road in South Beach. ``We could only help about five.''

Average rates for a 30-year, fixed-rate mortgage fell to 5.14 percent on Wednesday, the lowest level since 1971, reported Freddie Mac, the government-controlled mortgage giant. The number of people applying for mortgages rose by 50 percent last week, the Mortgage Bankers Association also reported.

It's another painful irony of living in one of the nation's worst hit housing markets -- borrowers who owe more than their homes are worth cannot refinance without ponying up thousands of dollars in cash to cover the difference between the old and new loan amounts.

And they're the ones in most dire need.

In South Florida, four in 10 homeowners who bought or refinanced over the past five years owe more on their home than it is worth, according to sales and mortgage data analyzed by Zillow.com, a web-based real estate services firm. Many of them chose adjustable-rate loans and other expensive mortgages because that was the only way they could afford the payments.

Justin Miller, a broker with Resource Mortgage Group in Plantation, said the current rates, which essentially amount to ''free money,'' are, in a sense, unavailable to those most in need.

''This is only putting people who are in a good position in a better position,'' Miller said.

Even when borrowers have the home equity they need to avoid a big cash payment, they must still meet rigorous underwriting demands that have become the bane of consumers. Equity refers to a borrower's ownership stake in a property, usually the home's market value minus any loans owed against it.

Before LaPenta begins processing an application, he said he makes sure customers are aware of the essential criteria needed to refinance: 20 percent equity in the property, a homestead exemption, a credit score of 700 or higher, a mortgage debt-to-income ratio of no more than 45 percent and the ability to fully document income and assets.

''If not, we're just wasting our time,'' LaPenta said. Still, it's hard to turn down desperate borrowers, whose harangues invariably end in accusations of hoarding federal bailout money, LaPenta said.

'They say, `We provided all the billions and you guys aren't helping us. Why aren't you lending it?' '' said LaPenta. He tells them he works on the front lines and has no say in the bank's underwriting policies.

Still, if you can qualify, the low interest rates offer a welcome financial boon.

Joshua Estrin, a dance and drama teacher in Broward County, on Monday locked in a 4.87 percent fixed rate for a 30-year loan on the Plantation home he refinanced in 2006, reducing his monthly payments by about $300.

''It's wonderful, and I feel very lucky, and every little bit helps. But I'm not the one losing my house,'' Estrin said.

Despite his stellar credit score, his lender showed no leniency in his application, he said. He also had 20 percent equity, though he had to have his home reappraised because the bank's automated valuation found him short by $7,000.

''The bank was putting me through the wringer, so I can only imagine someone who has been responsible, then being hit with hard times and now has a 600 or 650 credit score,'' Estrin said.

When it comes to cheap financing, home buyers -- not refinancers -- may be the biggest winners if they can brave the prospects of further price declines.

Though it still may be too soon to tell whether low rates will spur new sales, Madeleine Romanello, a real estate agent for Douglas Elliman Florida, said there are lots of fence-sitters still too worried about the market to take the plunge. People have learned from the boom years the perils of buying an overpriced property just because interest rates are low, Romanello said.

Florida, however, is basically ''on sale'' right now, Miller said, and buyers would be foolish not to take advantage of low home prices and low interest rates. Even if home price fall another 7 percent in six months, he said, buyers would still have a lower monthly payment if they financed their purchase at today's rates.

''The hardest thing about my job right now is seeing the great deals everybody else is getting,'' Miller said.


source:

http://www.miamiherald.com/business/story/825962.html

Dec 24, 2008

Jumbo Mortgage Shoppers Get Little Relief From Rates

By Kathleen M. Howley

Dec. 24 (Bloomberg) -- Jumbo mortgage shoppers in the most expensive U.S. housing markets such as New York and San Francisco aren’t getting much relief from lower borrowing costs.

The average 30-year fixed rate for home loans of more than $729,750 remains almost 2 percentage points above conforming rates and the spread between them may set a record this month, according to financial data firm BanxQuote.

Banks remain reluctant to lend after recording $678 billion in mortgage-related losses and writedowns in the past year and as house prices plunge. The collapse of the private mortgage securities market means lenders find there’s little demand for jumbo loans they want to sell. If low conventional rates entice enough homeowners to refinance, jumbo home loans may become more affordable as loan payoffs add liquidity to the banking system, said Keith Gumbinger, vice president of mortgage-research firm HSH Associates Inc. in Pompton Plains, New Jersey.

“A guy in a low-cost market like Des Moines probably doesn’t care much about helping someone in New York buy a million-dollar apartment, but if he refinances his conventional loan, that’s exactly what he’ll be doing,” Gumbinger said. “He’ll be giving lenders the liquidity they need to rebalance their loan portfolios and compete for jumbo borrowers who typically are the best in terms of credit quality.”

The average 30-year fixed jumbo loan rate was 7.32 percent on Dec. 22, compared with 5.38 percent for a conforming loan, according to BanxQuote of White Plains, New York.

Wide Spread

The difference between the two averaged 2.13 percentage points in December, 10 times the spread from 2000 to 2006 and above last month’s 1.95 percentage points that was the highest on record. If current rates reflected the historical difference of 0.2 percentage points, jumbo borrowers with an $800,000 mortgage would save $913 a month.

Buyers in markets that rely on jumbo loans, such as New York, San Francisco, and Boston, may see rates fall in 2009 because of Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke’s plan to buy at least $500 billion of securities issued by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, said Gumbinger. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are the largest buyers of mortgage debt in the U.S.

The Fed’s mortgage-bond buying program, announced Nov. 25, also provides for the purchase of $100 billion in direct debt of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Federal Home Loan Banks.

Bernanke’s plan adds to previous government actions aimed at lower home-financing costs, including the September seizure of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. As part of that takeover, the Treasury announced its own program to buy mortgage-backed securities to bolster the worst housing market in at least 70 years.

Loan Applications Rise

Mortgage applications in the U.S. jumped 48 percent last week as dropping rates promoted a surge in refinancing. The average U.S. conforming rate for a 30-year fixed mortgage this week is 5.14 percent, the lowest in data that go back to 1971, Freddie Mac, the world’s second largest mortgage buyer after rival Fannie Mae, reported today. A year ago the rate was 6.17 percent, the McLean, Virginia-based company said.

The Mortgage Bankers Association’s index of applications to buy a home or refinance a loan rose to 1,245.4, the highest since 2003, from 841.4 a week earlier. The group’s refinancing gauge rose 63 percent and purchases gained 11 percent.

While many homeowners are trying to lower their mortgage payments, buyers remain on the sidelines as prices fall.

The median U.S. home price plunged 13 percent in November from a year earlier, the largest drop on record and likely the biggest decline since the Great Depression of the 1930s, the National Association of Realtors said yesterday in a report.

Home Prices Tumble

Home prices are tumbling as foreclosure-related sales accounted for 45 percent of the month’s transactions, according to the Chicago-based trade group.

“The real elephant in the room is falling house prices,” Glenn Hubbard, former chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers under President George W. Bush who is now dean of the Columbia University Graduate Business School, said in an interview Dec. 22. “We can fix this by lowering mortgage interest rates.”

Declining prices won’t be helped by the Federal Housing Finance Agency’s announcement last month that it will lower the size of so-called expanded conforming mortgages that can be purchased by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Congress authorized raising the conforming limit of $417,000 to as high as $729,750 in about 90 of the nation’s most expensive housing markets in 2008 as a temporary measure to support housing.

Average Rates

The average rate for loans that are above the national cap of $417,000 but within the limit set by Congress is 5.51 percent, compared with 5.20 percent for a standard conforming loan, according to a survey by HSH Associates.

On Jan. 1 that expanded cap drops to $625,500 following the formula set out by July’s Housing and Economic Recovery Act. The law, known as HERA, specified a loan limit of 115 percent of an area’s median home price, rather than the 125 percent limit approved for this year by Congress, said Andrew Leventis, an FHFA economist. The change means more buyers in high-priced areas will have to use jumbo mortgages, he said.

The Fed on Dec. 16 cut its benchmark interest rate target to a range of zero to 0.25 percent and said it will add to the announced $500 billion in mortgage bond purchases as needed.

“Over the next few quarters the Federal Reserve will purchase large quantities of agency debt and mortgage-backed securities to provide support to the mortgage and housing markets, and it stands ready to expand its purchases of agency debt and mortgage-backed securities,” the policy makers said in a statement.

To contact the reporter on this story: Kathleen M. Howley in Boston at kmhowley@bloomberg.net.

Last Updated: December 24, 2008 15:22 EST

source:
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aRAdEz_u_fR4&refer=home

Dec 23, 2008

Sudden Upsurge in Demand for Mortgages May Not Be Met With Supply

Mortgage applications are up sharply as homeowners try to take advantage of low 30 year fixed rates. But tighter lending standards means that a fair number will be disappointed.

Moreover, the surge in mortgage applications is for refinances rather than new home purchases. And while refis will indirectly help the economy by increasing consumer discretionary income, the newly low mortgage rates do not yet appear to be stabilizing the housing market.

From the Financial Times:
Applications for home loans more than doubled in the two weeks after the Federal Reserve said it would buy mortgage bonds to help stabilise the market, prompting mortgage rates to fall by more than three-quarters of a percentage point.

With average rates for a 30-year, fixed-rate mortgage now at about 5.2 per cent, growing numbers of borrowers have an incentive to refinance to bring down their mortgage costs.

But tighter underwriting standards for prospective borrowers, combined with funding and staffing difficulties for mortgage originators, are likely to restrict the supply of new mortgages.

“The mortgage industry is collectively unprepared to deal with a cascade of business; staffs were pared to the bone as the market for mortgages shrank over the past year,” analysts at HSH Associates wrote in a note to clients.

Mahesh Swaminathan, mortgage analyst at Credit Suisse, said that as a result, lower rates would not necessarily create a wave of mortgage refinancing on the scale that was seen in 2003, when credit markets were healthy.

source:
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/12/sudden-upsurge-in-demand-for-mortgages.html

Dec 17, 2008

A refinancing rush as interest rates come down

Tony Jabon had an e-mail in to his mortgage broker by 10 a.m.

The 35-year-old environmental consultant in Charlotte, N.C., had heard about the Federal Reserve's decision to cut its key interest rate to nearly zero and wanted to refinance to something lower than 5.5 percent.

Within hours, he had locked in a rate of about 4.6 percent. He'll save about $160 on his monthly payment. "Any time you can save a dollar," he said, "why not?"

Homeowners across the country did the same Wednesday. Mortgage brokers reported a surge of calls from borrowers seeking to take advantage of the Fed's extraordinary decision. Some brokers were quoting mortgage rates of close to 4.5 percent for people with strong credit and hefty down payments.

The national average rate on 30-year, fixed mortgages was 5.06 percent on Wednesday, according to financial publisher HSH Associates — the lowest since the 1960s and down from 5.3 percent Tuesday.

"This is beautiful, oh my gosh!" said Patti Mazzara, a mortgage broker in the Minneapolis suburb of Edina, who was surprised when she looked up rates and found them well below 5 percent, down at least three-quarters of a percentage point from earlier in the week. "This is a whole new game now. Hopefully it's going to give people some relief."

The Fed, aiming to free up lending and jolt the economy back to life, cut the federal funds rate Tuesday from 1 percent to a target range of zero to 0.25 percent and pledged to keep funneling money into the market for mortgage investments.

It was the best news in months for anyone looking to lock in a 30-year, fixed-rate mortgage. But it was not expected to be a cure-all, and borrowers already in danger of foreclosure probably won't be able to take advantage.

"It's a call to action for homeowners looking to get out of adjustable-rate mortgages," said Greg McBride, senior financial analyst at Bankrate.com. "Unfortunately, it's not an equal-opportunity party."

Even Wall Street, which pushed the Dow industrials up 360 points after the Fed announcement Tuesday, tempered its enthusiasm on Wednesday. The Dow finished down about 100 points.

An estimated 12 million Americans owe more on their home loans than their houses' current value, unemployment is still rising quickly, and foreclosures are soaring.

For people whose home values have plunged, "I could have a 1 percent interest rate, but it wouldn't help them," said Michael Maynard, a mortgage broker in Branford, Conn.

"People losing their homes aren't losing their homes because they can't get a 6 percent mortgage," Maynard said. "They're not qualifying at all."

In Charlotte, Jabon's mortgage broker, Will Mullinix, said that while rates that low are "pretty unprecedented," the best deals are available only to borrowers with pristine credit who are taking out loans for under 80 percent of their house's current value.

"All the stars have to align," Mullinix said.

And economists expect falling rates to provide only a modest boost to home sales, especially as unemployment worsens amid what could be the longest economic downturn since the Great Depression.

"People tend to be more inclined to buy a house when they're confident about their employment and income prospects," said Wachovia Corp. economist Mark Vitner.

Besides lowering the interest on fixed-rate mortgages, rates should come down on adjustable-rate home equity loans. Those are tied to the prime rate, and prime rates came down immediately after the Fed move Tuesday.

The Federal Reserve also plans to buy up mortgage debt and is considering buying long-term Treasury bonds that are closely tied to mortgage rates, so analysts expect rates to drop even further.

"We're going to see just a massive refinancing boom," said Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Economy.com, who estimates that up to 10 million U.S. borrowers, or about one in five Americans with a mortgage, could wind up refinancing.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said Wednesday that some of the $700 billion financial bailout should spent to aid borrowers in danger of losing their homes.

"We've given enough big checks to these banks. Let's do something to help foreclosures," he said in a conference call with reporters.

President-elect Barack Obama's advisers were weighing an economic recovery plan that could cost as much as $1 trillion over two years. The figure is far bigger than the $600 billion that Obama's team initially envisioned.

Mortgage applications rose about 3 percent last week, but are still below highs for the year reached in early February, the last time rates were attractive enough to cause refinancings to surge.

For homeowners who haven't been able to sell their houses, the lower rates represent an opportunity to at least save some money. And if they have enough equity in their homes, they can still pull out money to make improvements — albeit at a higher interest rate.

Lisa Wallwork, 37, and her husband, Shawn, are in the process of refinancing the mortgage on the house they've owned for five years in Tolland, Conn. They pulled it off the market in September after their house didn't sell for more than a year.

"We wanted to move up to a bigger and better house," she said.

Instead, the couple are refinancing their $185,000 mortgage, pulling out equity to remodel their kitchen and getting a new front door. And they still expect to save up to $300 a month in the process.

Associated Press Writers Joshua Freed, Christopher S. Rugaber, Stephen Singer and Erica Werner contributed to this report.

link:

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5ioHc80xKMiATnqCpK0cDKJzk_nPQD954OPGO0


Dec 9, 2008

Majority of Modified Loans Fail Again, Regulator Says (Update3)

By Alison Vekshin

Dec. 8 (Bloomberg) -- Most U.S. mortgages modified in a voluntary effort to keep struggling borrowers in their homes and stem foreclosures fell back into delinquency within six months, the chief regulator of national banks said.

Almost 53 percent of borrowers whose loans were modified in the first quarter were more than 30 days overdue by the third quarter, John Dugan, head of the Treasury Department’s Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, said today at a housing conference in Washington.

“The results, I confess, were somewhat surprising, and I say that not in a good way,” Dugan said, citing a third-quarter survey his agency plans to release next week.

Lenders and loan-servicing companies have been modifying mortgages by lowering interest rates or creating repayment plans through the voluntary Hope Now Alliance. The group, which includes Citigroup Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Bank of America Corp., said last month it helped 225,000 borrowers keep their homes in October.

Foreclosures rose to a record in the third quarter as one in 10 U.S. homeowners fell behind on payments or were in foreclosure, the Mortgage Bankers Association said last week.

“Our third-quarter report will show many of the same disturbing trends as other recent mortgage reports,” Dugan said. “Credit quality continued to decline across the board, with delinquencies increasing for subprime, Alt-A and prime mortgages.”

The OCC’s survey represents institutions that service more than 60 percent of all first mortgages, or 35 million loans worth $6 trillion, Dugan said.

‘More Questions’

The data “raises more questions than answers because it fails to define, in any meaningful way, the modifications that have re-defaulted,” Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. Chairman Sheila Bair said in a statement.

The lack of detail makes it tough to distinguish “re- default rates of sustainable modifications versus cosmetic modifications that by their nature are more likely to re- default,” said Bair, who has proposed using $24 billion from the U.S. Treasury’s $700 billion financial-rescue package to modify 1.5 million mortgages through the end of 2009.

Dugan’s figures reflect a failed focus on interest rates in loan modifications, House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank said today in a Bloomberg Television interview. If companies were to cut the amount owed on mortgages, borrowers would be less likely to default again, Frank said.

“The people who made the bad loans or bought the bad loans from others need to realize” that they would be better off with principal reductions than with foreclosure, the Massachusetts Democrat said.

Foreclosure ‘Timeout’

New Jersey Governor Jon Corzine, speaking at the conference earlier today, urged a three- to six-month “timeout” on foreclosures, saying keeping people in their homes is necessary to correct a “deeply troubled” market.

“Housing markets and mortgage-finance markets are the fuel for this problem,” said Corzine, a Democrat and former chairman of Goldman Sachs Group Inc. “We need a systematic protocol and process.”

John Reich, director of the Office of Thrift Supervision, questioned whether the federal government should be more involved in foreclosure prevention.

“I do have a concern of allocating government resources with such a high rate of re-default,” said Reich, whose agency sponsored today’s National Housing conference

source: bloomberg.com

link to the original post:
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aZfUsedWrv5o&refer=home


Fort Lauderdale Blog and Real Estate News
Rory Vanucchi
RoryVanucchi@gmail.com

http://waterfrontlife.blogspot.com
www.FortLauderdaleLiving.net

Dec 7, 2008

Lower mortgage rates no silver bullet

The government is weighing plans to drive rates as low as 4.5%. But experts say that won't be enough to stabilize the housing market.



By Tami Luhby, CNNMoney.com senior writer

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Reducing mortgage rates to a historically low 4.5% may entice some homebuyers out of the shadows, but it won't be enough to really spur housing sales, experts said.

Only a week after the Federal Reserve unveiled a $600 billion plan to reduce mortgage rates, the Treasury Department is considering adding to the effort to lower rates even more. Both moves are intended to get more buyers into the market in hopes of stabilizing home prices and reviving the economy.

While Treasury officials are keeping mum about the latest proposal, lobbyists said Thursday it is aimed at reducing rates to 4.5% only for people buying homes. Those looking to refinance would not qualify.

There's no doubt, experts say, that the government needs to provide incentives to homebuyers.

Until now, all efforts were focused on addressing the record number of mortgage delinquencies. This should remain the priority, experts say, but it should be coupled with increasing demand for homes.

Adjusting mortgage rates, however, will only go so far in getting prospective home buyers into the market, experts said. Potential buyers remain spooked by falling home prices and rising unemployment. And even those who want to buy cannot find loans with reasonable downpayments and terms.

"The problem is not interest rates," said Kenneth Rosen, chair of the Fisher Center for Real Estate at University of California, Berkeley. "It's the availability of credit."

And, of course, there's still the issue of stemming foreclosures. The Bush administration has been loathe to mandate widespread loan modifications. Instead, it is opting to chip away at the problem by adjusting loans held by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and by asking banks to expand their programs.

But even federal officials acknowledge the economy won't recover until the tidal wave of foreclosures ends. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke Thursday said the government must do more to help struggling homeowners, possibly by buying delinquent mortgages and refinancing them to more affordable terms.

Treasury plan in the works

Lobbyists are ratcheting up pressure on federal officials to do more to entice homebuyers into the market. Various proposals have been floated, but lowering mortgage rates is among the more popular.

One of the more vocal industry groups, the National Association of Realtors, met with top Treasury officials last month to outline a plan to stabilize home prices through lower mortgage rates.

While details remain sketchy, its proposal calls for Treasury to subsidize rates so home buyers pay 4.5% for a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage. It would be similar to a homebuyer paying points -- a percentage of a home's value -- in return for a lower rate, but the government would foot the bill.

The plan would cost $50 billion, said Lawrence Yun, the group's chief economist.

Lowering rates to 4.5% -- about a percentage point below today's rate -- would spur 500,000 home sales over the next year, he said. That would put a big dent in the supply of 4.6 million homes on the market. Right now, there is a 10-month supply of homes for sale, three to four months more than in normal conditions.

A 4.5% mortgage rate would prompt many people to buy, even if they fear home prices will continue to fall and the economy to weaken, he said. Rates have not fallen below 5.37% for 45 years.

A wave of purchases should stabilize home values, which, in turn, will help the economy to turn around.

Last week's announcement by the Fed, which prompted a half-percentage point drop in rates, sent homebuyers' mortgage applications up 37.4%, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association.

"We need to do something to counter that pessimism," Yun said. "Doing nothing will exacerbate the problem."

Lowering rates is among several options the Treasury Department is considering. An announcement could come as early as next week.

More needs to be done

Experts, however, questioned whether buyers would take advantage of lower rates. They criticized government officials for taking a piecemeal approach -- with narrow programs unveiled every week -- rather than coming up with a comprehensive plan to stabilize the housing market.

"I don't think they are thinking through what they are doing," Rosen said.

What's keeping many homebuyers out of the market are stringent lending standards, not interest rates, experts said. As long as credit remains tight and many banks require 20% downpayments, many buyers will remain on the sidelines.

Instead, banks should make mortgages available with a 5% or 10% downpayment, Rosen said. And while he doesn't advocate a return to the "mirror standard" (when borrowers could get money if they simply could fog a mirror), banks should allow more people to qualify for fixed-rate mortgages if they show sufficient income.

The government could also provide more incentives to homebuyers. Instituting a federal tax credit at closing to help cover costs would appeal to many purchasers, said James Gaines, research economist with the Real Estate Center at Texas A&M University. A $7,500 credit approved by Congress this summer -- which is really a loan since it must be paid back -- isn't working.

"It hasn't done any good," Gaines said. "Make it a real credit for home purchases."

Another option is to provide incentives for investors to buy properties and turn them into rentals, he said. This could be done with various tax incentives, such as eliminating capital gains tax on homes owned for more than five years.

Other experts said a mortgage-rate reduction could work, but only if it were done on a temporary basis. That would prompt people to take advantage of the lower rates while they last, said Edward Leamer, director of the UCLA Anderson Forecast, a quarterly economic review.

As the economy continues to weaken, however, some economists say the answer to the housing crisis lies in stabilizing the job market. As more people lose their incomes, more fall behind in their mortgages and lose their homes. This trend will accelerate the number of foreclosures and keep prices in a downward spiral.

If people fear for their jobs, or even worse, have no job, they will not make big-ticket purchases like a home, said Christian Menegatti, lead analyst for economic research firm RGE Monitor. That's why the government should consider an economic stimulus package that will help keep both home values and employment from declining.

"Potential homebuyers may not be in the condition to buy a home no matter what because of a job loss or a drop in income," he said.

source: cnn.com

link to the original post:
http://money.cnn.com/2008/12/04/news/economy/low_mortgage_rates/index.htm?postversion=2008120512


Fort Lauderdale Blog and Real Estate News
Rory Vanucchi
RoryVanucchi@gmail.com

http://waterfrontlife.blogspot.com
www.FortLauderdaleLiving.net

Exec had mortgage racket down to an art

Exec had mortgage racket down to an art

Orson Benn has gone to prison for falsifying applications, but a former associate in Homestead still sells mortgages.

Borrowers Betrayed Part 4
Orson Benn's network of mortgage brokers wrote thousands of subprime loans in Miami-Dade which have gone into foreclosure.
MIAMI HERALD STAFF

jdolan@MiamiHerald.com

Orson Benn, once a vice president at the nation's largest subprime lender, spent three years during the height of the housing boom tutoring Florida mortgage brokers in the art of fraud.

From his office in New York, he taught them how to doctor credit reports, coached them to inflate income on loan applications, and helped them invent phantom jobs for borrowers.

When trouble arose -- one broker got caught, another got cold feet -- Benn called his trusted fixer in Miami to remove the problem and get the loan approved: Yvette Valdes.

The 48-year-old Valdes was a key figure in helping Benn tap into one of the country's most lucrative mortgage markets during his run with Argent Mortgage, The Miami Herald found.

Benn and several associates were convicted of racketeering this year, but Valdes still sells mortgages from a nondescript storefront in Homestead.

While prosecutors looked at roughly $100 million in loans written by Benn and a cadre of co-workers, that represents just a portion of the loans they approved during his aggressive expansion into Florida.

The Miami Herald found that Benn's network approved more than $550 million in home loans from Tampa to West Palm Beach to Miami, according to an analysis of court records.

In Miami-Dade County alone, Benn's office approved more than $349 million in loans on 1,913 homes -- more than one in three have since fallen into foreclosure, the analysis shows.

Valdes brokered at least 100 of those loans worth $22 million -- nearly all based on false and misleading financial information, the newspaper found.

One borrower claimed to work for a company that didn't exist -- and got a $170,000 loan. Another borrower claimed to work a job that didn't exist -- and got enough money to buy four houses.

In a brief interview with The Miami Herald, Valdes blamed the borrowers, refusing to comment further. Her lawyer, Glenn Kritzer, said she has done nothing illegal.

With so many of Benn's loans now in foreclosure, Miami-Dade County is littered with still more empty homes. Squatters inhabit some; crack dens occupy others. At least one has been stripped to the ground, leaving only the foundation.

''It's like a desert,'' said Reynaldo Perez, 41, who lives in a Homestead town house financed by Benn three years ago. ``Just on my street, there are five or six homes being foreclosed.''

Although the Office of Financial Regulation -- the state agency entrusted with policing the mortgage industry -- was alerted to Valdes's role in Benn's network at least three years ago, it never launched an investigation, the newspaper found.

Since 2005, the agency has had copies of some of the same misleading loan applications that The Miami Herald reviewed.

Terry Straub, the OFR's director of finance, acknowledged that his agency had evidence against Valdez. ''I don't have any explanation for why we didn't pursue it,'' he said.

In fact, state regulators ignored more than a dozen written warnings about brokers in Benn's network, the agency's records show.

Despite a law banning criminals from getting licensed -- created after a Miami Herald series was published this summer -- two brokers in Benn's network who pleaded guilty in May to conspiracy charges in the case remain licensed.

THE BEGINNING

The path to Valdes and other brokers began in 2002, when Benn was hired by Argent Mortgage, which would become the nation's largest provider of loans to people with low credit scores.

Known as ''Big O,'' the six-foot three-inch, 280-pound Benn grew up as the son of a subway mechanic in one of Brooklyn's toughest neighborhoods. Even without a formal banking education, he needed just three years to advance from a clerical job to vice president.

At first, his job was to trouble-shoot problems that cropped up in loan applications, court records and interviews show.

Argent made money bundling the mortgages and selling them to investors on Wall Street, not by collecting monthly checks and depending on the borrowers' ability to pay. The accuracy of loan applications was not a priority, Benn later testified.

With control over hundreds of millions of dollars in loans, Benn launched a subprime empire that would soon cover most of Florida.

After four months on the job, Benn flew to Tampa to meet with brokers who courted him with a luxury box at a Tampa Bay Lightning hockey game, football tickets and strip-club outings, court records show.

He taught one of those brokers, Scott Almeida, a convicted cocaine trafficker, to prepare phony income statements and doctor credit reports.

A few months later, Almeida introduced Benn to Tampa brokers David Tuggle and Eric Steinhauser.

After Benn taught them to prepare phony documents, they began to write millions of dollars in loans.

Along the way, the brokers showed their gratitiude. DHL envelopes stuffed with cash -- a total of hundreds of thousands of dollars -- routinely arrived at Benn's million-dollar house in the New York suburbs. In slightly more than two years, Tuggle and Steinhauser alone paid Benn between $70,000 and $100,000, they told police.

SOUTH FLORIDA LINK

As the scheme grew riskier, it extended south, almost 300 miles, to Yvette Valdes in Homestead.

Benn told Steinhauser to create a phony deed to help a borrower get a loan. But Steinhauser said he had trouble finding someone in Tampa willing to help him because the deed would be filed in court.

So, Benn referred him to Valdes at Sandkick Mortgage.

For 16 months, Valdes and her co-workers were a mainstay of Benn's lucrative Miami-Dade operations, writing more than $1 million worth of loans in a typical month.

The Miami Herald obtained every loan application that Sandkick sent to Argent between May 2004 and September 2005, for mortgages totaling $22 million.

The documents include the personal and financial information about the borrower supplied by the broker.

Out of 129 applications, 103 contained red flags: non-existent employers, grossly inflated salaries and sudden, drastic increases in the borrower's net worth.

The simplest way for a bank to confirm someone's income is to call the employer. But in at least two dozen cases, the applications show bogus telephone numbers for work references, the newspaper found.

On three applications, Valdes provided her own private cellphone number, even though the borrowers did not work for her.

Another application included a letter from ''Community Bank,'' saying the borrower had $63,000 in his account. The phone number on the letter does not belong to a financial institution, however. It belongs to Bill Rieck, a Key West city employee, who told The Miami Herald that he was surprised his number was used.

''I ain't no community bank,'' he said, adding that the cell number has been his for six years.

INCOME AT ISSUE

When Kendale Lakes couple Monica Gaviria and Stacy Duthely applied for a loan through Sandkick in January 2005, they declared a combined income of $68,000 a year. She was a hair stylist; he, an interpreter.

When the loan went through a few months later, the documents showed more than a fivefold increase, to $384,000.

Gaviria said that figure is grossly inflated, but said she knew nothing about the change on her mortgage application until this year when she fell behind on her payments and the bank called her.

She said the bank representative demanded, ``What's the problem? You make $17,000 a month.''

As the months went by, Valdes began to write more loans for Benn, records show. She started small with an $87,000 loan in May 2004, but the next month, her numbers rose to $750,650. By that September, she hit $1 million.

The following year, she went on a tear, breaking the $1 million mark seven times.

Along the way, some borrowers came back for more.

One Sandkick customer, Erica Wright, bought her first house in July 2004, when she was 21. Her loan application said she was the office manager at Weldon Industries, a Tampa fence manufacturer, for four years. The job paid $40,000 a year.

But when reached by The Miami Herald last month, the company's general manager, Scott Franzen, said, ``We've never had anyone here by that name.''

In September 2004, Wright bought three more houses using Weldon as the employer, even claiming a big raise to $78,840.

Wright could not be reached for comment. All four properties have fallen into foreclosure, leaving $501,677 in unpaid debt.

While Valdes was flooding Miami-Dade with risky loans, Benn's network drew the attention of state regulators several times.

One of the brokerages doing business with Benn -- Total Mortgage of Tampa -- incurred 10 complaints in just two years.

In four of those cases, state regulators confirmed that the company provided false and misleading information to get loans. The company owner put false data in her own mortgage application in 2004, regulators found.

Instead of pressing for disciplinary action, including suspending or revoking the license, the state closed the cases.

The company kept going, brokering two more loans -- later investigated by police -- that went directly to Benn's chief co-conspirator, Argent banker Sam Green.

Green managed to get two mortgages to buy one home. He used one loan to pay for the property, and illegally pocketed the other -- $79,000, he later admitted to police.

SCHEME UNRAVELS

While Benn and his co-workers approved more than half a billion dollars' worth of mortgages during their run at Argent, it was a complaint filed by an elderly Tampa borrower over a disputed loan that drew the attention of police in 2004.

As other borrowers stepped forward with similar complaints, Benn's network slowly unraveled.

Investigators from the humble Hillsborough County Consumer Protection Agency began to review Argent loans and discovered irregularities in the tens of millions of dollars.

One by one, Tampa area brokers pointed the finger at Orson Benn.

Last year, statewide prosecutors charged Benn in Polk County with racketeering. At least seven others have been arrested in the same scheme, including the other Tampa area brokers.

Argent succumbed to the troubles of the subprime market and was bought by Citibank last year.

Despite a crackdown on Benn's Tampa brokers, nothing happened to the Miami network where most of the loans were written, The Miami Herald found.

Benn, who has begun an 18-year prison sentence, did not respond to a request for comment. Neither did Tuggle or Steinhauser, both of whom pleaded guilty in the mortgage scheme and await sentencing.

Both are still listed with ''approved'' licenses on the OFR website, the only place consumers can check the status of brokers.

Although state regulators have known about Valdes's involvement for three years, they never took action against her or Sandkick Mortgage.

The agency identified her as an associated target in a fraud investigation of another broker in the Benn network in 2005, records show.

In addition, the file contains two Sandkick loan applications with bogus claims: one showing an inflated salary and the other a phony job.

Terry Straub, director of finance for the OFR, said he can't explain the lack of action.

Valdes and her co-workers wrote their last loan with Benn in late 2005. Since then, 40 percent of the properties have slipped into foreclosure, the newspaper found.

Some have fallen into disrepair, dragging property values down around them. Others are abandoned. One, in Liberty City, has been razed, leaving nothing but a weed-strewn lot.

Last week, Miami Herald reporters visited Valdes at her Homestead office, now known as Best Mortgage Choice. She refused to discuss the newspaper's findings.

When asked about the misleading information in her customers' loan applications, Valdes said, ``That's their problem.''

source: miamiherald.com

link to the original post:
http://www.miamiherald.com/business/real-estate/story/802703-p3.html


Fort Lauderdale Blog and Real Estate News
Rory Vanucchi
RoryVanucchi@gmail.com

http://waterfrontlife.blogspot.com
www.FortLauderdaleLiving.net

Predatory Lending - Are You a Victim?

With all of the finger-pointing and outcries about corrupt and greedy brokers and agents, every homeowner facing may feel victimized. And certainly, there was a of deception and outright in the during the boom years. But there are a few important to watch out for that may indicate the of a predatory company.

One of the clearest of predatory lending may be when homeowners or buyers are asked to sign documents that are completely blank or told to leave off the date. This gives the opportunity to backdate, forward-date, or fill in incorrect information on a application or disclosure forms, keeping important notices from the . When the time comes to close the loan, the buyers may receive a completely different loan than they originally were sold, but which curiously has what appears to be their signatures on all the required documents.

Closely related is the issue of being asked to sign documents that have blatantly misleading or false information on them. Inflating a family’s monthly income to qualify for a higher payment is nothing more than a set-up for down the road. Of course, some did this voluntarily and lied on their loan applications without the of their , but being asked by a loan originator to sign off on incorrect figures will lead to unintended consequences and possible or prosecution for .

Loan originators were also guilty during the bubble of putting homeowners in inappropriate with high or deadly interest adjustments. They persuaded the to go along with the loan in the hopes of refinancing in a year or two when their credit had improved. As is now known, however, most did not qualify for the mortgages in the first place and were unable to qualify for a once were raised and credit started becoming scarce. This helped lead directly to the crisis now facing the , as subprime never became prime; they just became sub-subprime.

Also, it is vitally important that homeowners, at the time of closing, carefully read the sales agreement and loan documents, especially the sales contract and in Lending . If there are any discrepancies, or the are being asked to sign for a loan that is different than the one they were promised, predatory lending may be being committed. In fact, should have copies of the closing documents at least 24 hours before the closing, and have reviewed them thoroughly and be ready to have any questions answered.

and brokers who relied on corrupt appraisers were also complicit in predatory schemes designed to boost their own at the expense of ’ abilities to pay their . Although homeowners want some appreciation of their properties, if they were originally sold a house at the top of an artificial market, an inflated appraisal may have been used. values should reflect the market conditions — not be inflated to the very highest amount that can be borrowed, putting the owners into a loan on a house that is not worth even close to what they pay for it.

Unfortunately, the amount of in the facilitated by the and the have led directly to a crisis of epic proportions. So many first time buyers and uneducated owners were taken of by lender misconduct and predatory that it is difficult to separate the unqualified who got in over their heads from the truly criminal companies that fraudulently induced this toxic debt. But if homeowners suspect they are a victim of in any way, they should the appropriate regulatory agencies and make sure to fight their in court for as long as it takes.

The ForeclosureFish website has been created to help homeowners research ways they can stop and defend against their ’s attempts to sell the house out from under them. The site describes various methods to use, including refinancing and modifications, along with more information about predatory lending and other lender misconduct. Visit ForeclosureFish to read more about various aspects of the process, as well as how to recover from a hardship: http://www.foreclosurefish.com/


source: offshoreblog.net

link to the original post:
http://offshoreblog.net/predatory-lending-are-you-a-victim/



Fort Lauderdale Blog and Real Estate News
Rory Vanucchi
RoryVanucchi@gmail.com

http://waterfrontlife.blogspot.com

www.FortLauderdaleLiving.net



almost three years of investigating alleged predatory lending and fraud cases

After almost three years of investigating alleged predatory lending and cases for primarily Spanish speaking clients in Monterey, Santa Cruz, , and San Benito Counties, I came to the startling that over 98% of those who had or were losing homes to were involved in some type of scheme. This led me to conduct some research. I found that with the of lending , vast numbers of unscrupulous brokers and appraisers were committing , often with the if not assistance of their clients.

While the widespread schemes and tactics utilized were sometimes elaborate and some times crude, all were at least initially successful, if means a house to own and/or in your pocket. How did this happen? who could never have afforded homes with a conventional loan were provided the opportunity to become with no down and no of income. This created an opportunity to speculate in the market with minimal or no monetary . And, with no of being sued, criminally charged, or losing licenses to operate, many brokers and agents went putting in homes they could not afford. All the prospective buyer had to do was sign on the . Fraudulent conduct rose to epic proportions.

To comprehend the blatant that was being committed, and ignored by the California Department of , (D.R.E.) district and other police agencies, you only have to ask yourself a simple question. How many do you know who have walked into a Ferrari dealership and were handed keys to a $180,000 Highway Patrol- attention-grabbing red F-430 after they told the salesperson, “Hey I want to buy that mean red machine, but I don’t have a down payment and my wife and I earn a combined annual income of less than $20,000″? Then, how did a California couple employed at a shop earning a combined annual income of $35,360 purchase a $628,000 without a down payment and with one hundred percent financing? Or, how did a California seasonal worker purchase a $598,000 with no down payment and with one hundred percent financing while earning $8.76 per hour at a lettuce packing shed in Salinas? How did the expect the lettuce packer and makers to meet $4,000 plus monthly payments, or did they? And, how did the lettuce packer and makers actually think that they could afford even the teaser rates of $1,800 per month, or did they? The makers and the lettuce packer are not to the rule, but rather the majority. And they are real ; they were my clients.

The majority of the news media, , and legislators either do not have a concept as to what actually occurred in the crisis, or they are intentionally misleading the public. A couple years back, I predicted a severe . I had been asked to speak at several functions by the California Association of Brokers, National Association of Hispanic Professionals, and the Santa Cruz County Board of . The attendees laughed when I made the predication. The was still hot but, suspiciously at the same time, homeowners were defaulting on their at a record pace. The professionals’ general response was that the problem was temporary and that in a year things would be back to normal. They didn’t want to hear that the houses were so overvalued that even persons could not afford them, especially since the majority of their clients were working class making well below wages.

Easy and inflated appraisals are the why spun out of sight and then rapidly declined and are still declining. were exaggerated for several reasons. The brokers that were relying on to help them had a vested interest in closing the deal at any cost because they were going to make regardless if the borrower had the means to repay the loan. The greater the loan amount, the more unscrupulous brokers earned. with little or no began homes at a record pace, some offering to pay more than the asking price, further inflating . As increased, owners soon resorted to refinancing constantly. Appraisals were falsified so could pull out cash, most of the time leaving homes with little, if any equity. My clients routinely pocketed $50,000, $60,000, $70,000 or more in transactions months after properties. These were the very same who couldn’t even afford a down payment or the payments. Some of the cash was spent on and vehicles, some invested in other .

The escalating to purchase homes has ended leaving values in question. Ask yourself what your property is worth today. The answer is, what you can sell it for, and more likely than not, your property will have to compete with a nearby in . With so many and a tightening credit market, prices continue to fall on a . But, let’s say you can afford a ten percent down payment on a $400,000 . Why would you purchase the today when there is no indication when will stabilize? You could easily loose the $40,000 down payment in less than six months. When will stabilize? Knowing what actually occurred, it will be at least five years before we hit the bottom.

So most of this you have probably heard before. But I learned something more by looking at hundreds of loan applications and documents given to me by clients claiming they were lied to and cheated by their brokers. But first you should ask why come to me, a private investigator, instead of to an attorney or public agency for assistance?

The majority of district and police agencies has little, if any, of lending and practices and regulations, and therefore was deemed worthless even by actual victims of . For example, in 2007 the County District Attorney’s Consumer unit had not made one arrest for and/or predatory lending practices in related cases. This is the norm in most counties throughout California. The California Department of (D.R.E.), until just very recently, would not even respond to complaints of unlicensed activity. Their response was that they only regulate licensed persons. If the individual didn’t have a license, what could they do? Yet in 2006, ignoring my calls and written complaints, they went as far as providing a license to a previously unlicensed woman who had been a “loan consultant” on one of my cases. I reported her for to both the D.R.E. and Monterey County District Attorney. I provided them with a 7 page investigative report with verification that she had conducted without a license. She had even paid restitution to one of my clients after being caught threatening her with deportation if the client complained about the loan. Less than six months after I submitted my report, the loan consultant was provided a license to operate.

So I turn back to my question, why did the come to me, a private investigator? After interviewing and re-interviewing , and checking and cross checking documents, I came to the realization that my clients believed that a threat of an investigation would coerce brokers, or other parties to the loan transactions, to give them the promised to them in their deals. In a , it’s hard to recover if you’re in on the .

In one case that I was hired to conduct an investigation, an unemployed eighty-year-old blind and diabetic man was unknowingly sold a $680,000 by his granddaughter’s husband who had refinanced the several times and had depleted all of the equity in the process. With the assistance of an unlicensed “Loan Consultant” and unscrupulous , they falsified the grandfather’s date of birth (he was now 45 years old) and his income (it was stated he earned over $100,000 as the owner of a service) on the loan application. The appraiser inflated the value of the . The and his unlicensed “Loan Consultant” profited almost $20,000 in , and over $27,000 (4%) for selling the . The granddaughter’s husband profited $80,000 in the sale. The eighty-year-old grandfather, who had nothing to lose but his credit, immediately the in . The granddaughter’s husband became enraged when he determined that the charged him a fee to sell the . He wanted all or a portion of the $27,000. The granddaughter’s husband was the client who came to me claiming the had wronged him.

There are the clients that “loaned” their credit and signatures for a price, and then complained when they did not receive the payments promised or when their credit was ruined because the buyers they had never failed to make the payments. Every client that came to me crying predatory lending had claimed that they earned over $100,000 as owners on their loan applications. But in reality they were maids and maintenance men, dishwashers and makers earning minimum wages. They came to me claiming they had been deceived about the payments. But the real problem was that they had been led to believe that they could in a year when the payment on their adjustable adjusted upward, and they suddenly found themselves with a three-year prepayment penalty. Their loan consultants had made extra putting them into a prepayment penalty loan, but neglected to explain to them that they would be penalized when they refinanced. But the clients didn’t stop and think about the fact that they had falsified their on their loan applications, and that they should never have been given the initial loan, much less a . These are just a few of the , believe me there are many, many more.

Why did began giving out like drunken sailors? I theorize that an attempt was made to forestall a in 2002, and resorted to a ponzi-loan sharking type so initial in the know would profit millions of dollars. The others, the flippers, and the ones that were misled to believe they could make a quick buck from the , were left holding the bag. What was not taken into and anticipated was the devastation that the would leave in it’s wake.

What should alarm every payer who will help bail out these is that few lawsuits are being filed and few are going to jail. Although, we may never experience this type of fiasco again, both the and industries are in dire need of regulatory changes. California’s Department of should also be reorganized. The D.R.E. should be empowered to settle and mediate claims of predatory lending and . And, they should also require licensees to be insured and bonded, and that their license is printed on all . Will this prevent completely? Absolutely not, but it will deter the conduct that has been prevalent in the industry.

I realize that my observations and opinions will be questioned and maybe create a big brouhaha, because they will ask what do I know? I am only a gumshoe.


source: offshoreblog.net

link to the original post:
http://offshoreblog.net/what-do-i-know-i-am-only-a-gumshoe/


Fort Lauderdale Blog and Real Estate News
Rory Vanucchi
RoryVanucchi@gmail.com

http://waterfrontlife.blogspot.com
www.FortLauderdaleLiving.net